• Education empowers the poor
  • Spreading smiles
  • The poor need opportunities
“We  shall  not  look  at  caste  or  religion,  All  human  beings in  this land  whether  they be those who preach the  vedas  or  who  belong  to  other  castes  are  one”


28 Aug




Panel of nine judges of the Supreme Court of India have now given an unanimous decision that  right to privacy is a fundamental right and is essentially a natural right to every individual. The judges have  said that it is indeed inseparable and in alienable from human being.  The judges have further said that the fundamental rights are the only constitutional fire wall to prevent state’s interference with those core freedom constituting liberty of human being. 

The judges have also opined that privacy includes at it’s core the preservation of personal intimacies, the sanctity of family life, marriage procreation , the home and sexual orientation.  Finally, the judges have conclusively pointed out  that privacy also connotes  a right  to be left alone.

The above judgement of the Supreme Court have been widely welcomed in India and has been hailed as historic verdict of far reaching significance.

While  the above judgement have occupied considerable media space, cartoons are also appearing that a son refuses to show his mark sheet to his parent claiming it to be a matter of fundamental right and subject of his privacy. The advocates of lesbian practices say  that their sexuality is now a fundamental right for them. Next, prostitution will also be hailed  to be fundamental right.  There are also demand that the government should not ask for any personal details from citizens such as  finger prints, photographs etc. which have been made mandatory by the government for issuing Aadhaar card (identity card). The ridiculous arguments in defence of privacy go on endlessly.

In India ,demand for privacy and fundamental rights of individual citizens are being taken to such an extreme level  that is not prevailing in any other country in the world ,including USA and Western Europe, which boast  themselves  as ultimate model of democracy.

Many well meaning critics of Indian democracy often term it as a chaotic democracy , with demonstrations and protests on one issue or other having become the order of the day all over India. In a country of 1300 million people , often it is seen that a group of one thousand protesting people can  bring any project or scheme to a stand still by  demonstrating  on public roads or obstructing traffic in busy thoroughfares. The government often adopts tolerant attitude towards such protestors, viewing it   as their fundamental and birth right to protest. Several well meaning projects now remain stranded in India due to such protests by miniscule of population.

There are critics who argue that India is paying too big a price  for it’s nearly unrestricted freedom given to the people. It is also pointed out that  Indian economic and industrial progress have considerably slowed down due to such excessive freedom.  In spite of the fact that Indian population has now reached alarming level and is still continuing to increase at unacceptable pace causing huge issues for the country, the government does not have the courage to force the population to adopt limited family norms. China, a country not known for freedom for people, adopted one child policy and brought the population surge under control that has benefited China.  In the atmosphere of freedom in India , this cannot be done.

The unanimous judgement given by the Supreme Court of India in favour of privacy may lead to a situation that the power and authority  of government may be severely restricted in  implementing policies and programmes that are urgently needed for the progress of India.

It remains to be seen that after pronouncing such unanimous views , whether the Supreme Court judges will clarify that even while granting the fundamental rights of privacy , the freedom for individuals cannot be absolute and has to be curtailed  when matter of national need or security are required.  While the judges have made some vague observations on these lines, they are yet to put down their views very clearly, so that “the freedom lovers” will not go astray.

The judges have to clearly say that liberty is not a personal affair but a social contract. It is an adjustment of individual interests. While one has the liberty to play piano with high volume in the middle of the night, he cannot do this while disturbing the sleep of his neighbor. Will the “freedom lovers” in India realize this?

After experimenting with 70 years of  democracy after Independence, probably there is a strong case for controlled democracy in India , as different from free run democracy that the country has hitherto  seen.

All said and done, the privacy and fundamental right issue in India is blown out of proportions, that threatens to mar the progress of India.



There are 0 comments in this project

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.